Michigan judge blocks attempts to prosecute abortions in the state


A Michigan judge on Friday blocked county prosecutors from enforcing the state’s 1931 ban on abortion for the foreseeable future after two days of witness testimony from abortion experts, providers and the state’s chief medical officer.

The ruling comes after the state Court of Appeals said earlier this month that county prosecutors were not covered by a May order and could enforce the prohibition following the fall of Roe v. Wade by the U.S. Supreme Court in a June decision.

“The harm to the body of women and people capable of pregnancy in not issuing the injunction could not be more real, clear, present and dangerous to the court,” Oakland County Judge Jacob Cunningham said during his ruling Friday.

Cunningham had filed a restraining order against county prosecutors hours after the Aug. 1 appeals court decision and following a request from attorneys representing Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

While a majority of prosecutors in counties where there are abortion clinics have said they will not enforce the ban, Republican prosecutors in Kent, Jackson and Macomb counties have said they should be able to enforce the 1931 law.

WATCH l Background on the abortion rights battle in Michigan (June 27):

Confusion over abortion in Michigan

Planned Parenthood Michigan says there is ‘a lot of confusion’ over abortion legality in Michigan, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. But abortions continue in the state, after an injunction in May blocked a 1931 ban from taking effect.

Cunningham listened to arguments Wednesday and Thursday in Pontiac, Mich., before granting the preliminary injunction, which is expected to keep abortion legal throughout the state until the Michigan Supreme Court or voters could decide in the fall.

The 1931 law in Michigan, which was triggered after the U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, bans abortion in all instances except to save the life of the mother. The dormant ban was retroactively blocked from going into effect in May when Judge Elizabeth Gleicher issued a preliminary injunction.

The state Court of Appeals later said that the preliminary injunction only applied to the attorney general’s office, meaning that providers could get charged with a felony by some county prosecutors.

Attorneys representing Whitmer and Democratic prosecutors argued that allowing county prosecutors to decide whether to enforce the 1931 ban would cause confusion and force many providers to cease all abortion services.

“We can’t expect doctors to read the minds of a prosecutor and to try to figure out what a prosecutor thinks that life-saving exception means. That is precisely what would happen if the preliminary injunction is not issued,” Washtenaw County Prosecutor Eli Savit said during closing arguments Thursday.

Possible ballot initiative

David Kallman, an attorney representing two Republican county prosecutors, said in closing arguments that granting a preliminary injunction isn’t how laws should be changed.

“It’s the right of all the people of the state of Michigan to weigh in and vote or go through their representatives and do it through the proper legislative and elected process to change a law,” Kallman said.

Michigan has been a rare example of a Democratic-led state where a ban of the procedure has become a distinct possibility after the seismic Dobbs v. Jackson opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court. Several Republican-led states, most in the South, either banned or severely limited abortion access immediately after the Supreme Court decision, or plan to do so soon.

A ballot initiative seeking to enshrine abortion rights into Michigan’s constitution turned in 753,759 signatures in July and is expected to ultimately decide the status of abortion access in the state. The amendment awaits final approval for the November ballot by the state’s Board of Canvassers.

The status of abortion in Michigan is expected to drastically impact the battleground state’s November general election, where Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel, also a Democrat, have made abortion rights a centrepiece of their re-election campaigns.

“Absent this preliminary injunction, physicians face a very real threat of prosecution depending on where they practise,” Nessel said in a statement issued following Friday’s ruling.

The Republican nominee for governor, Tudor Dixon, has said she believes life begins at conception and even opposes exceptions for abortions in cases where pregnancy has resulted from rape or incest.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.